On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015å¹´07æ03æ¥ 17:58, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>Aren't the scl_modes for CbCr planes always the same as for Y plane?
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >No, such as src(1920 x 1080) -> dst(1280x800), yuv format is NV12.
>>> >so Y plane horizontal and
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Mark yao wrote:
>>> +static void _vop_cal_scl_fac(struct vop *vop, const struct vop_win_data
>>> *win,
>>> +uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h, uint32_t
>>> dst_w,
>>> +uint32_t dst_h, uint32_t pixel_format)
>>>
On 2015å¹´07æ03æ¥ 17:58, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> >>Aren't the scl_modes for CbCr planes always the same as for Y plane?
>> >
>> >
>> >No, such as src(1920 x 1080) -> dst(1280x800), yuv format is NV12.
>> >so Y plane horizontal and vertical is scale down.
>> >
>> >but src_w = 1920 / 2 = 960 <
On 2015å¹´07æ03æ¥ 15:46, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Mark Yao wrote:
>> Win_full support 1/8 to 8 scale down/up engine, support
>> all format scale.
> [snip]
>
>> @@ -351,6 +412,15 @@ static inline void
Hi Mark,
Please see my comments inline.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Mark Yao wrote:
> Win_full support 1/8 to 8 scale down/up engine, support
> all format scale.
[snip]
> @@ -351,6 +412,15 @@ static inline void vop_mask_write_relaxed(struct vop
> *vop, uint32_t offset,
> }
> }
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 06:58:44PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Mark yao wrote:
> >> Aren't the scl_modes for CbCr planes always the same as for Y plane?
> >
> >
> > No, such as src(1920 x 1080) -> dst(1280x800), yuv format is NV12.
> > so Y plane horizontal and
Win_full support 1/8 to 8 scale down/up engine, support
all format scale.
Signed-off-by: Mark Yao
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix scale dest info.
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 389 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h | 96 +++
2 files
