On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 15:42:15, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lee
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > > This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings:
On 2021-11-16 15:42:15, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings: besides some
> > > cleanup it is now actually possible to
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Hi Lee
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings: besides some
> > cleanup it is now actually possible to specify a non-contiguous array of
> > enabled strings (not
Hi Lee
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings: besides some
> cleanup it is now actually possible to specify a non-contiguous array of
> enabled strings (not necessarily starting at zero) and the values from
> DT
This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings: besides some
cleanup it is now actually possible to specify a non-contiguous array of
enabled strings (not necessarily starting at zero) and the values from
DT are now validated to prevent possible unexpected out-of-bounds
register and array
