On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Once the series is completely applied, the pwm_chip isn't allocated
> > using devm_kzalloc any more. You're only looking at an intermediate
> > state where I
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Laurent,
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > (CC'ing Bartosz)
>
> I'm already in discussion with Bart :-)
>
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > >
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:17:15AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:14:14AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 8:05 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:15:51AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > > > @@ -1585,22
Hello Laurent,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> (CC'ing Bartosz)
I'm already in discussion with Bart :-)
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This prepares the pwm driver of the ti-sn65dsi86 to further changes of
> > the pwm
Hi Uwe,
(CC'ing Bartosz)
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This prepares the pwm driver of the ti-sn65dsi86 to further changes of
> the pwm core outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc().
> There is no intended semantical
Hello Doug, hello Bjorn,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:14:14AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 8:05 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:15:51AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > > @@ -1585,22 +1586,28 @@ static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = {
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 8:05 AM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> Hello Doug,
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:15:51AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > @@ -1585,22 +1586,28 @@ static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = {
> > > static int ti_sn_pwm_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> > >
Hello Doug,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:15:51AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > @@ -1585,22 +1586,28 @@ static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = {
> > static int ti_sn_pwm_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> >const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
> > {
> > +
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 5:52 AM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> This prepares the pwm driver of the ti-sn65dsi86 to further changes of
> the pwm core outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc().
> There is no intended semantical change and the driver should behave as
> before.
>
>
This prepares the pwm driver of the ti-sn65dsi86 to further changes of
the pwm core outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc().
There is no intended semantical change and the driver should behave as
before.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c |
10 matches
Mail list logo
