Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] clk: Improve clock range handling

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:35:22 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This is a follow-up of the discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ > > and here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914093515.260031-1-max...@cerno.tech/ > > While the initial proposal

Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] clk: Improve clock range handling

Hi, On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 07:08:39PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-02-25 06:35:22) > > Hi, > > > > This is a follow-up of the discussion here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ > > > > and here: > > https://lore.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] clk: Improve clock range handling

Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-02-25 06:35:22) > Hi, > > This is a follow-up of the discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ > > and here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914093515.260031-1-max...@cerno.tech/ > > While the initial proposal imp

[PATCH v7 00/12] clk: Improve clock range handling

Hi, This is a follow-up of the discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ and here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914093515.260031-1-max...@cerno.tech/ While the initial proposal implemented a new API to temporarily raise and lower clock rates