On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:21:36AM -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:14:43AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 10:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:00:26PM
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:14:43AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 10:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:00:26PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > HW revision is mandatory field for DisplayPort branch
> > > devices. This is defined in DPCD register
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 10:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:00:26PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > HW revision is mandatory field for DisplayPort branch
> > devices. This is defined in DPCD register field 0x509.
>
> But what do we want to do with it? Me, I don't see a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:14:43AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 10:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:00:26PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > > HW revision is mandatory field
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:00:26PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> HW revision is mandatory field for DisplayPort branch
> devices. This is defined in DPCD register field 0x509.
But what do we want to do with it? Me, I don't see a point in parsing a
bunch of stuff from the DPCD unless there's a real
HW revision is mandatory field for DisplayPort branch
devices. This is defined in DPCD register field 0x509.
v2: move drm_dp_ds_revision structure to be part of
drm_dp_link structure (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 27 +++
