Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for devices in the Energy Model

Hi Rafael, On 5/29/20 5:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:01 PM Lukasz Luba wrote: Hi Rafael, On 5/27/20 10:58 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: Hi all, Background of this version: This is the v8 of the patch set and is has smaller scope. I had to split the series into two:

Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for devices in the Energy Model

Hi Rafael, On 5/27/20 10:58 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: Hi all, Background of this version: This is the v8 of the patch set and is has smaller scope. I had to split the series into two: EM changes and thermal changes due to devfreq dependencies. The patches from v7 9-14 which change devfreq

Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for devices in the Energy Model

On 5/29/20 5:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:01 PM Lukasz Luba wrote: Hi Rafael, On 5/27/20 10:58 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: Hi all, Background of this version: This is the v8 of the patch set and is has smaller scope. I had to split the series into two: EM

Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for devices in the Energy Model

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:01 PM Lukasz Luba wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > On 5/27/20 10:58 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Background of this version: > > This is the v8 of the patch set and is has smaller scope. I had to split > > the series into two: EM changes and thermal changes due

[PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for devices in the Energy Model

Hi all, Background of this version: This is the v8 of the patch set and is has smaller scope. I had to split the series into two: EM changes and thermal changes due to devfreq dependencies. The patches from v7 9-14 which change devfreq cooling are going to be sent in separate patch series, just