On 5 October 2015 at 16:45, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is v9 of an attempt to make it easier for devices to remain in
> runtime PM when the system goes to sleep, mainly to reduce the time
> spent resuming devices.
>
> For this, we interpret the absence of all PM callback implementations
On Monday, October 05, 2015 04:45:28 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is v9 of an attempt to make it easier for devices to remain in
> runtime PM when the system goes to sleep, mainly to reduce the time
> spent resuming devices.
>
> For this, we interpret the absence of all PM callback
Hi,
this is v9 of an attempt to make it easier for devices to remain in
runtime PM when the system goes to sleep, mainly to reduce the time
spent resuming devices.
For this, we interpret the absence of all PM callback implementations as
it being safe to do direct_complete, so their ancestors