On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 30 May 2012 12:02:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 30, 2012
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 12:02:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > The passed mode must not
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
> > >
> > >
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
Thank you for
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
This will break the i915 driver, as it modifies mode->clock in
intel_dp_mode_fixup(), hence the RFC state. Is this incorrect behaviour from
the i915 driver ?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com
Acked-by: Daniel
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
Signed-off-by:
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 12:02:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The passed mode must not be
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 12:02:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 11:18:56 Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at
The passed mode must not be modified by the operation, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com
---
This will break the i915 driver, as it modifies mode-clock in
intel_dp_mode_fixup(), hence the RFC state. Is this incorrect behaviour from
the i915 driver ?
12 matches
Mail list logo