Re: [RFC][PATCH v6 0/7] Generic page pool & deferred freeing for system dmabuf heap

2021-02-05 Thread John Stultz
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:36 AM Christian König wrote: > Am 05.02.21 um 09:06 schrieb John Stultz: > > Input would be greatly appreciated. Testing as well, as I don't > > have any development hardware that utilizes the ttm pool. > > We can easily do the testing and the general idea sounds solid to

Re: [RFC][PATCH v6 0/7] Generic page pool & deferred freeing for system dmabuf heap

2021-02-05 Thread Christian König
Am 05.02.21 um 09:06 schrieb John Stultz: This series is starting to get long, so I figured I'd add a short cover letter for context. The point of this series is trying to add both deferred-freeing logic as well as a page pool to the DMA-BUF system heap. This is desired, as the combination of

[RFC][PATCH v6 0/7] Generic page pool & deferred freeing for system dmabuf heap

2021-02-05 Thread John Stultz
This series is starting to get long, so I figured I'd add a short cover letter for context. The point of this series is trying to add both deferred-freeing logic as well as a page pool to the DMA-BUF system heap. This is desired, as the combination of deferred freeing along with the page pool