Am 05.12.23 um 18:14 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:56 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:58 AM Christian König wrote:
Am 05.12.23 um 16:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Thu,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:56 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:58 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 05.12.23 um 16:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Christian König
> > > wrote:
> > >> Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 23,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:58 AM Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 05.12.23 um 16:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:30 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> [SNIP]
> >>> So, this patch
Am 05.12.23 um 16:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:30 PM Rob Clark wrote:
[SNIP]
So, this patch turns out to blow up spectacularly with dma_fence
refcnt underflows when I enable
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:30 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> >> [SNIP]
> > So, this patch turns out to blow up spectacularly with dma_fence
> > refcnt underflows when I enable DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE ..
Am 04.12.23 um 22:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:30 PM Rob Clark wrote:
[SNIP]
So, this patch turns out to blow up spectacularly with dma_fence
refcnt underflows when I enable DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE .. I think,
because it starts unwrapping fence chains, possibly in parallel
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:30 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 7:03 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 23.03.23 um 14:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:35 AM Christian König
> > > wrote:
> > >> Am 22.03.23 um 23:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > >>> From: Rob
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 7:03 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 23.03.23 um 14:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:35 AM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 22.03.23 um 23:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> From: Rob Clark
> >>>
> >>> Container fences have burner contexts, which makes
Am 23.03.23 um 14:54 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:35 AM Christian König
wrote:
Am 22.03.23 um 23:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark
Container fences have burner contexts, which makes the trick to store at
most one fence per context somewhat useless if we don't unwrap
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:35 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 22.03.23 um 23:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > Container fences have burner contexts, which makes the trick to store at
> > most one fence per context somewhat useless if we don't unwrap array or
> > chain fences.
>
Am 22.03.23 um 23:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark
Container fences have burner contexts, which makes the trick to store at
most one fence per context somewhat useless if we don't unwrap array or
chain fences.
Mhm, we intentionally kept them not unwrapped since this way they only
From: Rob Clark
Container fences have burner contexts, which makes the trick to store at
most one fence per context somewhat useless if we don't unwrap array or
chain fences.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
tbh, I'm not sure why we weren't doing this already, unless there is
something I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo