Hi Laura,
On 13 October 2014 14:05, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 1:07 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
>>
>> Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
>> constraints via struct device, and dma-buf framework would manage the
>> common constraints for all attached device
Hi Greg, Daniel!
On 12 October 2014 00:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:09:00PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 01:37:56AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
>> > Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
>> > constraints via s
On 10/10/2014 1:07 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
> constraints via struct device, and dma-buf framework would manage the
> common constraints for all attached devices per buffer.
>
> With that information, we could have a 'generic'
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:09:00PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 01:37:56AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
> > constraints via struct device, and dma-buf framework would manage the
> > common constra
Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
constraints via struct device, and dma-buf framework would manage the
common constraints for all attached devices per buffer.
With that information, we could have a 'generic' allocator helper in
the form of a central dma-buf ex
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 01:37:56AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Devices sharing buffers using dma-buf could benefit from sharing their
> constraints via struct device, and dma-buf framework would manage the
> common constraints for all attached devices per buffer.
>
> With that information, we cou
