Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] new cgroup controller for gpu/drm subsystem

2019-07-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 01:10:28AM -0400, Kenny Ho wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:24 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Another question I have: What about HMM? With the device memory zone > > the core mm will be a lot more involved in managing that, but I also > > expect that we'll have classic

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] new cgroup controller for gpu/drm subsystem

2019-06-29 Thread Kenny Ho
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:24 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > Another question I have: What about HMM? With the device memory zone > the core mm will be a lot more involved in managing that, but I also > expect that we'll have classic buffer-based management for a long time > still. So these need to

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] new cgroup controller for gpu/drm subsystem

2019-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:05 PM Kenny Ho wrote: > This is a follow up to the RFC I made previously to introduce a cgroup > controller for the GPU/DRM subsystem [v1,v2]. The goal is to be able to > provide resource management to GPU resources using things like container. > The cover letter from

[RFC PATCH v3 00/11] new cgroup controller for gpu/drm subsystem

2019-06-26 Thread Kenny Ho
This is a follow up to the RFC I made previously to introduce a cgroup controller for the GPU/DRM subsystem [v1,v2]. The goal is to be able to provide resource management to GPU resources using things like container. The cover letter from v1 is copied below for reference. [v1]: