On 04/25/2012 03:45 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
with the I2C core.
I think this is doing the same thing as a patch I posted recently:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
What's the advantage of one way over
* Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 03:45 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
> > with the I2C core.
>
> I think this is doing the same thing as a patch I posted recently:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
I
This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
with the I2C core.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 34 ++
include/linux/of_i2c.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git
On 04/25/2012 03:45 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
> with the I2C core.
I think this is doing the same thing as a patch I posted recently:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
What's the advantage of one way over
This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
with the I2C core.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 34 ++
include/linux/of_i2c.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
* Stephen Warren wrote:
On 04/25/2012 03:45 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
This function resolves an OF device node to an I2C adapter registered
with the I2C core.
I think this is doing the same thing as a patch I posted recently:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
I wasn't
