Hi Jerome,
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 12:45:23 Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stan
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchar
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> >> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinch
Hi Jerome,
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 12:45:23 Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stan
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> >> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinch
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 22 March 2012 16:58:27 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchar
Hi Laurent,
On 03/22/2012 08:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Thank you very much for your comments and question.
They were very useful.
You're welcome.
Please refer to the comments below.
On 03/22/2012 11:
Hi Laurent,
On 03/22/2012 08:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
>> They were very useful.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>> Please refer to the comments below.
>>
On 03/22/2012 03:52 PM, Subash Patel wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On 03/22/2012 08:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>>> Hi Laurent,
>>> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
>>> They were very useful.
>>
>> Y
Hi Laurent,
On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
>> They were very useful.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>> Please refer to the comments below.
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
> They were very useful.
You're welcome.
> Please refer to the comments below.
>
> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 Marc
Hi Laurent,
Thank you very much for your comments and question.
They were very useful.
Please refer to the comments below.
On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Stanisl
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for the patch.
On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Tomasz Stanislawski
>
> This patch combines updates and fixes to dma-contig allocator.
> Moreover the allocator code was refactored.
> The most important changes are:
> - functions were reordered
From: Tomasz Stanislawski
This patch combines updates and fixes to dma-contig allocator.
Moreover the allocator code was refactored.
The most important changes are:
- functions were reordered
- move compression of scatterlist to separete function
- add support for multichunk but contiguous scatte
On 03/22/2012 03:52 PM, Subash Patel wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On 03/22/2012 08:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>>> Hi Laurent,
>>> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
>>> They were very useful.
>>
>> Y
Hi Laurent,
On 03/22/2012 03:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
>> They were very useful.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>> Please refer to the comments below.
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:36:33 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> Thank you very much for your comments and question.
> They were very useful.
You're welcome.
> Please refer to the comments below.
>
> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 Marc
Hi Laurent,
Thank you very much for your comments and question.
They were very useful.
Please refer to the comments below.
On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Stanisl
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for the patch.
On Thursday 22 March 2012 11:02:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Tomasz Stanislawski
>
> This patch combines updates and fixes to dma-contig allocator.
> Moreover the allocator code was refactored.
> The most important changes are:
> - functions were reordered
From: Tomasz Stanislawski
This patch combines updates and fixes to dma-contig allocator.
Moreover the allocator code was refactored.
The most important changes are:
- functions were reordered
- move compression of scatterlist to separete function
- add support for multichunk but contiguous scatte
20 matches
Mail list logo