> Am 30.09.19 um 11:51 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
> >> Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be
> used in a driver.
>
> >>> As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported
> >>> (that
Am 30.09.19 um 11:51 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
>> Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be
used in a driver.
>>> As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported
>>> (that is not
>
> Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
> >> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be
> >> used in a driver.
> >>
> > As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported
> > (that is not internal) functions.
> > Not that the idea of making
Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
>> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be
>> used in a driver.
>>
> As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported
> (that is not internal) functions.
> Not that the idea of making them internal is
>
> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be
> used in a driver.
>
As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported
(that is not internal) functions.
Not that the idea of making them internal is bad but this comment is
a wrong statement.
>
