Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 1/3] drm/qxl: allow both PRIV and VRAM placement for QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_SURFACE

2018-12-07 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:39:54AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:55:58AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > qxl surfaces (used for framebuffers and gem objects) can live in both > > > > VRAM and PRIV ttm domains. Update placement setup to include

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 1/3] drm/qxl: allow both PRIV and VRAM placement for QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_SURFACE

2018-12-06 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:55:58AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > qxl surfaces (used for framebuffers and gem objects) can live in both > > > VRAM and PRIV ttm domains. Update placement setup to include both. Put > > > PRIV first in the list so it is preferred, so VRAM will have

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 1/3] drm/qxl: allow both PRIV and VRAM placement for QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_SURFACE

2018-12-06 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:55:58AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > qxl surfaces (used for framebuffers and gem objects) can live in both > > VRAM and PRIV ttm domains. Update placement setup to include both. Put > > PRIV first in the list so it is preferred, so VRAM will have more room > >

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 1/3] drm/qxl: allow both PRIV and VRAM placement for QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_SURFACE

2018-12-06 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> qxl surfaces (used for framebuffers and gem objects) can live in both > VRAM and PRIV ttm domains. Update placement setup to include both. Put > PRIV first in the list so it is preferred, so VRAM will have more room > for objects which must be allocated there. > > Signed-off-by: Gerd