On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 18:41 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 25/02/15 17:11, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > gentle ping
> >
> Afaics it's very had to get in this code nowadays - drm_server_info is
> set only via the legacy (?) function drmSetServerInfo. With the latter
> only(?) used by the xserver when
On 25/02/15 17:11, Jan Vesely wrote:
> gentle ping
>
Afaics it's very had to get in this code nowadays - drm_server_info is
set only via the legacy (?) function drmSetServerInfo. With the latter
only(?) used by the xserver when working with dri1 modules. So testing
this is likely to be very
gentle ping
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 19:10 -0500, Jan Vesely wrote:
> The only user I found is xserver, it can return -1 under certain conditions.
> So check for -1 explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely
> ---
>
> I could not find whether it's actually legal to return encoded negative values
The only user I found is xserver, it can return -1 under certain conditions.
So check for -1 explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely
---
I could not find whether it's actually legal to return encoded negative values
in get_perm. This is a quick fix to detect the one case that I found.
xf86drm.c
