Am 19.04.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked
On 20 April 2017 at 04:42, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>>
>>> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
>>> around a sem_file to see how
On 19 April 2017 at 22:07, Christian König wrote:
> Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>
>> Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
>> around a sem_file to see how they might look.
>>
>> This means the drm_syncobj are currently only
On 04/19/2017 05:07 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
around a sem_file to see how they might look.
This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores,
the flags field could
Am 13.04.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
around a sem_file to see how they might look.
This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores,
the flags field could be used in future to use it for other things,
and
Okay I've taken Chris's suggestions to heart and reworked things
around a sem_file to see how they might look.
This means the drm_syncobj are currently only useful for semaphores,
the flags field could be used in future to use it for other things,
and we can reintroduce some of the API then if