Re: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-19 Thread Satish Nagireddy
Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for the reply. Could you please give little more details on how "atomic modesetting" will help this? As I have to pass field type with every buffer, are there any existing flags or can I add new flags in drm_mode_atomic struct? Regards, Satish On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at

Re: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Satish, On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 23:04, Satish Nagireddy wrote: > The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of > alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers. > > The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD > and

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:28 PM > > To: Ville Syrjälä > > Cc: Satish Kumar Nagireddy ; dri- > > de...@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced > > alternate fields > > > > On Mo

RE: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-11 Thread Satish Kumar Nagireddy
ddy ; dri- > de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced > alternate fields > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote: > > The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of > > alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers. > > > > The

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-10 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote: > The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of > alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers. > > The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD > and

[RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-10 Thread Satish Kumar Nagireddy
The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers. The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD and DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD to DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE ioctl? But in case if urrent

Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced alternate fields

2018-09-07 Thread Satish Nagireddy
Hi, Could you please suggest me on this? The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers. The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD and DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD to