reedesktop.org;
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor
> specific DRM devices
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote:
>> By this reply, are you suggesting that
: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific
DRM devices
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user
I wo
(resending because previous email switched to HTML mode and was filtered out)
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> > will never be acceptable
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> > will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user
>
> I wouldn't say never but
Am 20.11.18 um 19:58 schrieb Kenny Ho:
Since many parts of the DRM subsystem has vendor-specific
implementations, we introduce mechanisms for vendor to register their
specific resources and control files to the DRM cgroup subsystem. A
vendor will register itself with the DRM cgroup subsystem
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user
I wouldn't say never but whatever which gets included as a cgroup
controller should have
Hi Tejun,
Thanks for the reply. A few clarifying questions:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:21 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, I'm still pretty negative about adding drm controller at this
> point. There isn't enough of common resource model defined yet and
> until that gets sorted out I think it's in
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:58:11PM -0500, Kenny Ho wrote:
> Since many parts of the DRM subsystem has vendor-specific
> implementations, we introduce mechanisms for vendor to register their
> specific resources and control files to the DRM cgroup subsystem. A
> vendor will register itself
