On 01.02.2012 12:31, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
Christian,
You said elsewhere that you have half-finished patches that illustrate the
interface Jerome prefers - if you send them to me, I can work on finishing
them.
Responding to the rest of the message:
Well it's probably easier to type that down
2012/2/1 Michel Dänzer :
> On Die, 2012-01-31 at 22:08 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> 2012/1/31 Jerome Glisse :
>> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:56:01PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> >> On Die, 2012-01-31 at 16:59 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
>> >> > Userspace currently busywaits for fences to comp
Christian,
You said elsewhere that you have half-finished patches that illustrate the
interface Jerome prefers - if you send them to me, I can work on finishing
them.
Responding to the rest of the message:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:55:43PM -05
On Die, 2012-01-31 at 22:08 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> 2012/1/31 Jerome Glisse :
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:56:01PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On Die, 2012-01-31 at 16:59 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> >> > Userspace currently busywaits for fences to complete; on my workload,
> >> >
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:13:00PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:55:43PM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
Some comments below.
+ struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_priv
2012/1/31 Jerome Glisse :
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:56:01PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On Die, 2012-01-31 at 16:59 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
>> > Userspace currently busywaits for fences to complete; on my workload, this
>> > busywait consumes 10% of the available CPU time.
>> >
>> > Pr
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:13:00PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:55:43PM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Some comments below.
> >>
> >> > + struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
> >> > + stru
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:55:43PM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
>>
>>
>> Some comments below.
>>
>> > + struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
>> > + struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
>> > + struct radeon_bo *robj;
>> > + void *buffe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:55:43PM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
>
>
> Some comments below.
>
> > + struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
> > + struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
> > + struct radeon_bo *robj;
> > + void *buffer_data;
> > + uint32_t *fence_data;
> > + int r = 0;
> > +
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:56:01PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2012-01-31 at 16:59 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > Userspace currently busywaits for fences to complete; on my workload, this
> > busywait consumes 10% of the available CPU time.
> >
> > Provide an ioctl so that userspac
Some comments below.
> + struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
> + struct radeon_bo *robj;
> + void *buffer_data;
> + uint32_t *fence_data;
> + int r = 0;
> + long timeout;
> + int ring = RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX;
> +
>
On Die, 2012-01-31 at 16:59 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> Userspace currently busywaits for fences to complete; on my workload, this
> busywait consumes 10% of the available CPU time.
>
> Provide an ioctl so that userspace can wait for an EOP interrupt that
> corresponds to a previous EVENT_WR
Alex Deucher pointed out an error on IRC; I'm not using
radeon_irq_kms_sw_irq_get and put to manage the IRQ enablement.
I've fixed this up (as per the partial hunk below), and my bug goes away. I
will be cleaning these patches up for proper submission.
Simon
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Simon Far
13 matches
Mail list logo
