i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Chris Wilson wrote at 16:02:08 > drm-intel-next contains patches to hopefully workaround the hang. So > hopefully your machine will no longer die whilst we uncover the root > cause. > -Chris Well, I appreciate it:-) - b/c today I run again into this issue w/ 2.6.35.6 - BTW again, if I walked

Re: i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Chris Wilson wrote at 16:02:08 drm-intel-next contains patches to hopefully workaround the hang. So hopefully your machine will no longer die whilst we uncover the root cause. -Chris Well, I appreciate it:-) - b/c today I run again into this issue w/ 2.6.35.6 - BTW again, if I walked thru

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2 kernel: [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26 ... 010-10-04T15:00:56.379+02:00 n22 kernel: INFO: task i915:907 blocked for more than 120 seconds. 2010-10-04T15:00:56.379+02:00 n22 kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. 2010-10-04T15:00:56.379

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Chris Wilson wrote at 16:02:08 > memory is truly flushed before the interrupt fires. [T400 is ironlake?] > -Chris It is a Intel GM45 Chipset. -- MfG/Kind regards Toralf F?rster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Toralf F?rster wrote: > today I run at the latest 2.6.35.6 kernel few apps like Lotus Notes > under wine, I'm still stuck with 2.6.36-rc1, and both here and on many/most earlier kernels I get a few seconds of very irritating stuttering whenever I run wine. It is definately related to interaction

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:08:47 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > Toralf F??rster wrote: > > today I run at the latest 2.6.35.6 kernel few apps like Lotus Notes > > under wine, > > I'm still stuck with 2.6.36-rc1, and both here and on many/most > earlier kernels I get a few seconds of very irritating

Re: i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Chris Wilson wrote at 16:02:08 memory is truly flushed before the interrupt fires. [T400 is ironlake?] -Chris It is a Intel GM45 Chipset. -- MfG/Kind regards Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 ___

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

/var/log/messages | grep kernel > 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: INFO: task i915:868 blocked for > more than 120 seconds. > 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: "echo 0 > > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. > 2010-09-29T11

i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Hello, today I run at the latest 2.6.35.6 kernel few apps like Lotus Notes under wine, amarok and firefox and in parallel a "git bisect" when I got this : n22 ~ # grep 2010-09-29T11:21 /var/log/messages | grep kernel 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: INFO: task i915:868 blocke

Re: i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

| grep kernel 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: INFO: task i915:868 blocked for more than 120 seconds. 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. 2010-09-29T11:21:36.984+02:00 n22 kernel: i915 D ffa47280 0

Re: i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Toralf Förster wrote: today I run at the latest 2.6.35.6 kernel few apps like Lotus Notes under wine, I'm still stuck with 2.6.36-rc1, and both here and on many/most earlier kernels I get a few seconds of very irritating stuttering whenever I run wine. It is definately related to interaction

Re: i915 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:08:47 +0200, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Toralf Förster wrote: today I run at the latest 2.6.35.6 kernel few apps like Lotus Notes under wine, I'm still stuck with 2.6.36-rc1, and both here and on many/most earlier kernels I get a few seconds of very