Re: rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > print_symbol() removal. > > This now avoids any possible printk interleaving. > > Unfortunately, without some #ifdef

Re: rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > > print_symbol() removal. > > > > This now avoids any

rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:48 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? > > Sure: arm, c6x, m68k, microblaze, and sh. I have a patchset that creates a