Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 for ppc xf86-log etc

2002-04-23 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:44:59 +0200 Peter Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okey, i think i have located some of the problems one is that there > only are 4mb of sdram on my Mach64 graphics board and that the driver > requests: > > (WW) ATI(0): DRI static buffer allocation failed -- need at

[Dri-devel] Mach64 for ppc xf86-log etc

2002-04-23 Thread Peter Andersson
Okey, i think i have located some of the problems one is that there only are 4mb of sdram on my Mach64 graphics board and that the driver requests: (WW) ATI(0): DRI static buffer allocation failed -- need at least 5625 kB video memory The second problem is that the kernel identifies my graphi

[Dri-devel] Re: Ati Mach 64 development on ppc

2002-04-23 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.04.24 00:55 Peter Andersson wrote: > Okey, i have just downloaded and compiled the dri mach64-0-0-4-branch on > XFree86 version 4.20 and Mesa version 4.0.2 with linux kernel 4.2.18 and > everything compiled without crashing! As of now i don´t get direct Great. > rendering but that´s pr

Re: [Dri-devel] Status of tcl branch

2002-04-23 Thread Michael
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:19:32PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Ian Romanick wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Michael wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Can people with outstanding problems wrt. the tcl branch please let

Re: [Dri-devel] Status of tcl branch

2002-04-23 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:19:32PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Ian Romanick wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Michael wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Can people with outstanding problems wrt. the tcl branch please let

Re: [Dri-devel] Status of tcl branch

2002-04-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Romanick wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Michael wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Can people with outstanding problems wrt. the tcl branch please let me know. > > > I'd like to get that code merged pretty soon, perhaps by th

Re: [Dri-devel] Status of tcl branch

2002-04-23 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Michael wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Can people with outstanding problems wrt. the tcl branch please let me know. > > I'd like to get that code merged pretty soon, perhaps by the end of the month. > > The c

Re: [Dri-devel] Status of tcl branch

2002-04-23 Thread Michael
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Can people with outstanding problems wrt. the tcl branch please let me know. > I'd like to get that code merged pretty soon, perhaps by the end of the month. The couple I posted the other day and... a) glean crashes on a full run

[Dri-devel] TCL testing

2002-04-23 Thread Garry Reisky
I've went through some of the games I have installed and here's what I have to report. Quake3 -Missing Textures -Stripple? shot1: http://chronoworx.dhs.org/~terracon/tcl/q3dm6.jpg shot2: http://chronoworx.dhs.org/~terracon/tcl/q3dm13.jpg shot3: http://chronoworx.dhs.org/~terracon/tcl/texture3.jp

[Dri-devel] Linux DRM update needed (volunteers?)

2002-04-23 Thread Jens Owen
I've been seeing some suspicious e-mails regarding DRM version mismatches, so I spent this morning digging into the r128 DRM versions. >From what I've looked at, it appears backwards compatability from a kernel perspective is maintained (at least from XFree86 4.1.0 forward) for the r128 driver.