There are files left over in the bsd DRM's driver subdirectories after
the merge to trunk. These got moved a directory above that (or to
shared/drm/kernel/), but the leftovers are getting in the way. I tried
to cvs rm and commit, but I got the following:
cvs server: failed to remove tag `HEAD'
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> Leif Delgass wrote:
>
> > The backtrace from the static server was the same. BTW, this might help
> > others trying to debug with a dynamic server: I removed 'Load "GLcore"'
> > from my XF86Config, because I saw that it was being reloaded by the glx
> > m
Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
>
> [...]
>
The xc/config/cf/host.def in the DRI tree is setup to easily modified to
build a debuggable server. Attached is a copy of a modified host.def
file I used for debugging an i810 problem. You'll probably need to
On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 17:00, Simon Cahuk wrote:
> I get seg fault (core dumped) running glxgears.
> System:
> FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE, cards banshee, using glide3 ports.
> Glxinfo says DRI is enabled.
Which exact version of glide3? What compile flags did you give? Did it
spew any error messages bef
On Friday 05 July 2002 10:39, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:26:28 +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > >>With this, I think it's time to merge. Would anyone else be willing to
> > >>do it? (since I missed some stuff last time, like those id changes.
> > >>I'm not sure how those
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
[...]
> >>The xc/config/cf/host.def in the DRI tree is setup to easily modified to
> >>build a debuggable server. Attached is a copy of a modified host.def
> >>file I used for debugging an i810 problem. You'll probably need to add
> >>the mach64 driver to
I get seg fault (core dumped) running glxgears.
System:
FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE, cards banshee, using glide3 ports.
Glxinfo says DRI is enabled.
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://
Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
>
>
>>Leif Delgass wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>
However, I think you may be tickling a latent bug in the DRI. It's
possible that all the other drives have just avoided this bug
On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 14:55, Stefan Lange wrote:
>
> on more comment: xv seems to be broken, it only gives me a black overlay
> window with mplayer. are there plans to merge with gatos some time?
http://www.keithp.com/~keithp/download/radeon_video.diff makes Xv work
with all Radeon chips.
http:/
Hi,
I have been playing with the new binary radeon 8500 drivers. Most
applications work fine but
I have experienced problems with the following applications:
o RTCW: A lot slower that with my old banshee but that could just be
because I am running
out of memory (128Mo is obviously not enough
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> Leif Delgass wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>However, I think you may be tickling a latent bug in the DRI. It's
> >>possible that all the other drives have just avoided this bug so far.
> >>
> >>I looked at
Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>However, I think you may be tickling a latent bug in the DRI. It's
>>possible that all the other drives have just avoided this bug so far.
>>
>>I looked at DRICloseScreen and I don't see that the DRIClipNotify
>>wra
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
[snip]
> However, I think you may be tickling a latent bug in the DRI. It's
> possible that all the other drives have just avoided this bug so far.
>
> I looked at DRICloseScreen and I don't see that the DRIClipNotify
> wrapper is being removed. There ar
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Could you give a quick explanation, just for my understanding, of the
> differences between the dualhead Matrox cards (which support the DRI on
> the primary head) and the dualhead Radeon cards (which do not, currently).
DRI requires a hardware cursor. Matrox does not
Could you give a quick explanation, just for my understanding, of the
differences between the dualhead Matrox cards (which support the DRI on
the primary head) and the dualhead Radeon cards (which do not, currently).
Adam
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > A
Jens Owen wrote:
> The Linux Kongress is accepting applications for fully sponsered
> workshops. This is an opportunity for OS development communities to get
> together and work face to face for 3 days. See
> http://www.linux-kongress.org/2002/workshops/faq.html for more details.
>
> If you
Leif Delgass wrote:
> After merging the trunk into the mach64 branch, I get a segfault in the
> Xserver in DRIClipNotify (dereferences a null pointer when trying to call
> a wrapper function, I think) if direct rendering is disabled after
> DRIFinishScreenInit is called, e.g. if the init of the d
Hi,
the lastest cvs version crashes for me with a sig. fault when starting a
gl application. After taking a deeper look into it, it seems to be a
problem with the lastest changes in xc/xc/extras/Mesa/src/context.c (Tue
Jun 18 03:29:39 2002 UTC (2 weeks, 3 days ago) by brianp). After
checking out
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Actually, Jens, I'm not even talking about getting it working with
> Xinerama. Just a traditional dualhead setup with two independent
> displays. Last time I tried this, the radeon driver disabled DRI.
The traditional dualhead setup with two independent displays fr
Hi!
I just checked out and compiled the r200-0-1-branch:
>> glxgears: ~ 1650 fps
>
> I've just commited a small optimization that gears benefits from. It
> may be quite close now...
its about 1720 now ;-)
[...]
>
> A large part of this difference is presumably due to HyperZ - something
Jens Owen wrote:
> The Linux Kongress is accepting applications for fully sponsered
> workshops. This is an opportunity for OS development communities to get
> together and work face to face for 3 days. See
> http://www.linux-kongress.org/2002/workshops/faq.html for more details.
>
> If you
The Linux Kongress is accepting applications for fully sponsered
workshops. This is an opportunity for OS development communities to get
together and work face to face for 3 days. See
http://www.linux-kongress.org/2002/workshops/faq.html for more details.
If you are interested in attending a
22 matches
Mail list logo
