I've installed 4.2.99 extras and tdfx driver from directory bleeding edge:
(WW) TDFX(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xe800,0x200)
(II) TDFX(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp-IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp-PIOOffset is 0xbd00
(II) TDFX(0): Changing back offset from 0x00573000 to 0x00572000
(II)
On Don, 2002-11-14 at 09:40, Jacek Popawski wrote:
I've installed 4.2.99 extras and tdfx driver from directory bleeding edge:
(WW) TDFX(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xe800,0x200)
(II) TDFX(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp-IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp-PIOOffset is 0xbd00
(II) TDFX(0):
Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
I've installed 4.2.99 extras and tdfx driver from directory bleeding edge:
(WW) TDFX(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xe800,0x200)
(II) TDFX(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp-IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp-PIOOffset is 0xbd00
(II) TDFX(0): Changing back offset from
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:24:33AM +0100, Stefan Lange wrote:
Could you try if that helps?
Yes, I've added Virtual to XF86Config and DRI works again. Thanks a lot!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your
David Balazic wrote:
Hi!
How is the Radeon 9000(/pro) support ( for linux/x86 ) ?
2D and 3D should work (there were some patches and some discussions
about 9000-support on the mailing-list recently, check the ml-archives)
That is the rv250 chip, right ?
yes
Is radeon 9000 much/any faster
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/X11/XFree86/DRI/DRM_for_2.4.19.diff.gz
Updated today (I made a small mistake that didn't show up with Radeon),
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
W licie z czw, 14-11-2002, godz. 11:52, Felix Khling pisze:
Hi,
several times I thought this problem was solved. But then it happens
again. I log out and when the gdm login screen should appear the monitor
goes to power saving mode and the system is completely locked up (even
SysReq
On Don, 2002-11-14 at 16:35, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 10 o'clock on Nov 14, Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= wrote:
This is the buglet related to the integration of the RandR extension, it
bases all calculations on the largest possible virtual resolution
instead of the one actually
°®Çé¶Ô¶ÔÅöSearching for Love
http://ch.search-love.com/ÊÇÒ»¸öרΪÄúÃÇÌṩ½»ÓѺÍÑ°ÕÒÔµ·ÝµÄ»ú»á£¬³ÏÒâÇëÁ¢¼´µÇ¼Ç³ÉΪ»áÔ±£¡±¾ÍøÕ¾ÉèÓжàÖÖ¹¦ÄÜ£¬
·½±ã´ó¼Ò¿ÉÓò»Í¬Í¾¾¶È¥ÈÏʶÐÂÅóÓѼ°Ñ°ÕÒÀíÏë¶ÔÏó¡£ÀýÈçʵʱ½»Ì¸ÊÒ¡¢ÁôÑÔ°å¡¢»áÔ±Èռǵȡ£
Ï£ÍûÄãÃÇÄÜ°ÑÎÕ»ú»á£¬ÕÒµ½×Ô¼ºµÄÁíÒ»°ë¡£
ÄÐÐÔ»áÔ±ÏÖÔÚ¼ÓÈ룬
Hi,
I made a small programme to illustrate the TCL/SW lighting differences.
It displays a square consisting of 10x10 quads which is lit by one
lightsource. The distance between the lightsource and the square is
changed periodically. With TCL this has the desired effect, with
software lighting it
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:02:02AM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
I made a small programme to illustrate the TCL/SW lighting differences.
It displays a square consisting of 10x10 quads which is lit by one
lightsource. The distance between the lightsource and the square is
changed periodically.
Since one of the ultimate goals of the texmem branches was to enable
implementing GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, I've been looking into adding extensions to
GLX. What I'd like to do is start by adding 2 (or 3) simple extensions to
get the hang of it, but I'm a bit stuck. There is GLX code in several
As everyone on dri-patches already knows, I've just commited a TON of
changes to the texmem-0-0-1 branch. I modified the R100 R200 drivers to
look more alike. I run the following from within the radeon directory to
see the differences between the two drivers:
for i in *.[ch] ; do
diff -ud
13 matches
Mail list logo
