Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Jon Smirl wrote:
Is there any special reason that user space and kernel drivers don't share the
same header files for IOCTL numbers and structures? I'm working on the radeon
ones and the structures match between the two sets of header files but there are
spelling and capitalization variations. For
Is there any special reason that user space and kernel drivers don't share the
same header files for IOCTL numbers and structures? I'm working on the radeon
ones and the structures match between the two sets of header files but there are
spelling and capitalization variations. For example:
typedef
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:03:13PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
> >--- Otto Solares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>How can i interface with your changes?, currently i open the fbdev,
> >>mmap fb and mmio region, set desired fbdev mode, load r200 dso, pull hooks
> >>and
> >>everyt
I'm working on a function like the one below for copying out the VBIOS ROM. This
would make a good candidate for a device indepenent DRM IOCTL (with a callout
for the bug fix). This is something that really should be fixed in X. Mapping
the ROM in from user space without the kernel's knowledge is a
Mr. Vindenes,
--- "Ronny V. Vindenes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 23:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > > > > There's a patch in -mm2 that does something with drm/agp (haven't looked
> > > > > at it yet):
> > > > >
> > > > > +drm-agp-module-dependency-fix.patch
> > > > >
> >
Hello,
i stumbled across the above mentioned define and
related code in the XFree86 sources (lnx_video.c).
comparing X4.1.0 and X4.3.0 i found that the
condtitnal coding of "if (base % size)" has
vanished at some point in time and the handling
is now hardcoded at this code location.
to my best k
Mr. Morton,
> diff -bBpur fix/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
> linux-2.6.0-test9-mm2/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
> --- fix/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 2003-11-06 00:49:53.299160210 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.0-test9-mm2/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 2003-11-06
> 00:27:43.00
Michel,
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 22:24, Bradley Chapman wrote:
> > Mr. Danzer,
>
> FYI, the correct transliteration of my last name would be 'Daenzer', but
> I feel more comfortable if people simply call me Michel.
Sorry about that. My default when spe
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:05, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > This makes me wonder how difficult it would be to get two servers to
> > cooperatively share a DRM instance (both of them holding the DRM open,
> > rather than the reinit thing done before).
>
> I thought the reason for the
Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This makes me wonder how difficult it would be to get two
servers to cooperatively share a DRM instance (both of them
holding the DRM open, rather than the reinit thing done
before).
I'd find this useful. It would let me run X on one V
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:49:26PM +, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 03:49, Otto Solares wrote:
>
> > I am trying to deviate from windows and use instead workspaces, i really
> > think that windows are counter-productive, workspaces would be a
> > better way to manage different a
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 01:54, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Interesting... could these be used in combination? perhaps to get
> around the 2048 limit? or if we were to implement the iterative "zone"
> approach, process serveral zones at once?
No, but they could be used to render up to four cliprects of
Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Otto Solares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can i interface with your changes?, currently i open the fbdev,
mmap fb and mmio region, set desired fbdev mode, load r200 dso, pull hooks
and
everything is ok from there. The only thing i dislike with the current
aproach
is that we
19 matches
Mail list logo
