Has anyone tried Quake3 with r_primitives != 0 on non mga cards?
There's something very wrong with texture coordinates on mga.
--
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoT
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
sentance Monday!) On the flip side, I believe that all the Parhelia
related chips are programmable-pipeline only (i.e., no fixed function
hardware). Even if Matrox did release all the required documentation,
the Mesa infrastructure isn't far enough al
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or
4:00PM EST or 1:00PM PST, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
Logs of previous IR
Ian Romanick wrote:
Jan Eidtmann wrote:
So, support for three new cards in one mtx driver sounds just great,
isnt it?
*looks at DRI developers* PLEASE DO IT
I can't (and don't) speak for all the DRI developers, but supporting a
kernel modules for a closed-source client-side driver is so low on
Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
I just took the R200 snapshot and trying to run in on Radeon R250 Lf
(Mobility). First, I encountered the problem with ABI version (6 vs 7)
but after taking XFree86 executable from some well-known place
(mentioned in FAQ) XFree finally took off (first question - would it
Jan Eidtmann wrote:
So, support for three new cards in one mtx driver sounds just great,
isnt it?
*looks at DRI developers* PLEASE DO IT
I can't (and don't) speak for all the DRI developers, but supporting a
kernel modules for a closed-source client-side driver is so low on the
priority list tha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 23:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone actually tested the functionality which this patch is supposed
> > to provide? That loading the DRM module magically triggers a load of AGP?
>
> Haven't tried it, but I doubt it doe
