Re: [Dri-devel] security, cvs, was Re: interface bindings of x-server

2003-11-19 Thread Mike Mestnik
ssh uses IP4:127.0.0.1, and as many times as ppl have asked for unix socket support it has allways been denied. -nolisten tcp is something for the distros to set up, it should be *usable by default. * Meaning all non-devel features on and nothing extra for the user to do. --- Keith Whitwell

Re: [Dri-devel] Fedora + DRI R200 binary snapshots - libGL problem

2003-11-19 Thread Jos Fonseca
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:57:25AM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote: Stock drivers never have. You may want to help with the kernel patches floating around for this? Well, I don't really know. I am not a big kernel expert. I just say what I see: when I run standard Fedora X driver -

Re: [Dri-devel] Fedora + DRI R200 binary snapshots - libGL problem

2003-11-19 Thread Sergey V. Oudaltsov
pre-install r200 modprobe -k agpgart Just one question. Should it be r200 or radeon? Thanks for the config line, I'll try it. Sergey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more

Re: [Dri-devel] Fedora + DRI R200 binary snapshots - libGL problem

2003-11-19 Thread Jos Fonseca
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:02:50PM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote: pre-install r200 modprobe -k agpgart Just one question. Should it be r200 or radeon? It should be radeon actually. My bad... Jose Fonseca --- This SF.net email is

[Dri-devel] r200 Xserver hang: strange

2003-11-19 Thread Andreas Stenglein
Hello! yesterday I got that annoying xserver hang on R200. XFree86 4.3.99.xx from october, DRI CVS HEAD (a few days old), Kernel 2.4.22 with v4l2. I verified with a fresh build of XFree86 CVS HEAD (yesterday). The strange things are the backtraces: 1. older XFree and current DRI CVS: (gdb) back

Re: [Dri-devel] Fedora + DRI R200 binary snapshots - libGL problem

2003-11-19 Thread Sergey V. Oudaltsov
It should be radeon actually. My bad... I knew! I knew! :) Well, anyway - this does not explain why libGL cannot find dri while xfree86.0.log says it is there... Sergey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does

Re: [Dri-devel] Fedora + DRI R200 binary snapshots - libGL problem

2003-11-19 Thread Jos Fonseca
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:25:49PM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote: It should be radeon actually. My bad... I knew! I knew! :) Well, anyway - this does not explain why libGL cannot find dri while xfree86.0.log says it is there... Sergey It must be the TLS thingy. Do ldd

[Dri-devel] Parhelia

2003-11-19 Thread Jan Eidtmann
Hello, my p650 arrived. 2d is great in linux and in windows i get 191 fps in quake3. i would like to play in linux though... so i was trying to build the matrox parhelia kernel module on linux 2.6.0-test9. but it did not compile: Using kernel headers in

Re: [Dri-devel] the state of Parhelia on FreeBSD

2003-11-19 Thread Arpi
Hi, quote from the matrox binary drivers README: Matrox Parhelia Millennium P650/P750 LINUX Display Driver V 1.0 Pro ^ ... Description of this release === Supported

Re: [Dri-devel] Parhelia

2003-11-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Jan Eidtmann wrote: my p650 arrived. 2d is great in linux and in windows i get 191 fps in quake3. i would like to play in linux though... so i was trying to build the matrox parhelia kernel module on linux 2.6.0-test9. but it did not compile: [snip] thats all spanish to me, so i ask, i please

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread Ronny V. Vindenes
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 20:46, Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:44:42AM -0800, James Jones wrote: hammers[i++] = loop_dev; nr_garts = i; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (i == MAX_HAMMER_GARTS) { printk(KERN_INFO PFX Too many northbridges for

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:17:17AM -0800, James Jones wrote: diff -ruN linux-2.6.0-test7/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c linux-2.6.0-test7-fixed/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c --- linux-2.6.0-test7/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c 2003-10-08 12:24:04.0 -0700 +++

AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread James Jones
Dave, Similar patch to Ronny's, but also changes a config check on x86_64 arch. It struck me that this patch is still slightly wrong. It should check the number of bridges already found before going through the entire detection routine again shouldn't it? -James Dave Jones wrote: On Fri,

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread James Jones
hammers[i++] = loop_dev; nr_garts = i; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (i == MAX_HAMMER_GARTS) { printk(KERN_INFO PFX Too many northbridges for AGP\n); return -1; } Seems wrong to me... wouldn't this return -1 if say, MAX_HAMMER_GARTS == 1 and 1 gart was

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:44:42AM -0800, James Jones wrote: hammers[i++] = loop_dev; nr_garts = i; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (i == MAX_HAMMER_GARTS) { printk(KERN_INFO PFX Too many northbridges for AGP\n); return -1; } Seems

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:32PM +0100, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: If we have an SMP system with an SMP kernel, we add however many GARTs to the table, up to a limit of MAX_HAMMER_GARTS. It looks like you'll add GARTS up to MAX_HAMMER_GARTS-1 then bomb if there is an

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:13:37PM -0800, James Jones wrote: Ronny V. Vindenes wrote It looks like you'll add GARTS up to MAX_HAMMER_GARTS-1 then bomb if there is an MAX_HAMMER_GARTS'th GART. Yes, thanks for putting it more clearly Ronny. Dave, try walking through the

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread James Jones
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote It looks like you'll add GARTS up to MAX_HAMMER_GARTS-1 then bomb if there is an MAX_HAMMER_GARTS'th GART. Yes, thanks for putting it more clearly Ronny. Dave, try walking through the code with MAX_HAMMER_GARTS=2 and SMP enabled. You should quickly see what we

Re: AMD 64 AGP Patch (Was Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?)

2003-11-19 Thread James Jones
The ( i MAX_HAMMER_GARTS) fix was just an example. The test really needs to be == and be moved before the hammers[i++] = loop_dev; assignment, or hammers will be overflowed, as I mentioned in my previous email. Also, it really seems like this test should be done before you go through all

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-19 Thread Lionel Ulmer
Either that or apps can work around buggy libGLs by checking the client extension string for GLX_ARB_get_proc_address. That extension is client-side only, so that's good enough. Well, this is the output of a glxinfo from an user with the bug : name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 Xserver hang: strange

2003-11-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 17:07, Andreas Stenglein wrote: yesterday I got that annoying xserver hang on R200. 'That' annoying hang? Have I missed something? *shrug* (gdb) back #0 0x4011fd54 in ioctl () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0xfc02 in ?? () #2 0x0867d5c6 in ?? () #3 0x084744d1 in

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Lionel Ulmer wrote: Either that or apps can work around buggy libGLs by checking the client extension string for GLX_ARB_get_proc_address. That extension is client-side only, so that's good enough. Well, this is the output of a glxinfo from an user with the bug : [snip] And you can see that

[Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon Xv alpha blending support

2003-11-19 Thread Alex Deucher
The attached patch adds alpha blending support to the video overlay on radeon hardware. It's been tested on my 9200. It adds three new Xv attributes: XV_ALPHA_MODE, XV_GR_ALPHA, and XV_OV_ALPHA. XV_ALPHA_MODE - (0 or 1) selects the alpha blending mode. right now it only supports key and global