There's a couple of bugs in 2.6.0-test9 regarding intel chipsets, that
misses the mask to enable the page.
Here's the diff.
Alan.
diff -u intel-agp.c.old intel-agp.c
--- intel-agp.c.old 2003-11-19 11:54:55.0 +
+++ intel-agp.c 2003-11-21 12:20:05.0 +
@@ -204,7 +207,7
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:26:08PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
There's a couple of bugs in 2.6.0-test9 regarding intel chipsets, that
misses the mask to enable the page.
Here's the diff.
Thanks, applied.
I wonder how that went unnoticed for so long.
Dave
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:36:05PM +, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:26:08PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
There's a couple of bugs in 2.6.0-test9 regarding intel chipsets, that
misses the mask to enable the page.
Here's the diff.
Thanks, applied.
I wonder how
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:06:23 +
Sergey V. Oudaltsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yess! I found! Strace is the girl's best friend!
r200_dri.so is linked against libexpat.so.1 - while Fedora only provides
libexpat.so.0. That is why libGL.so cannot load r200_dri.so - and
reports missing DR! At
Felix,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:51:40PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
José, many people are having this libexpat problem. What's the
recommended method to add some sort of trouble-shooting entry in the
Wiki? The TroubleShooting template seems to be tailored for
application-specific
I am wondering if there is any env variables or host.def lines I can add
that will improve performance of DRI. I have a radeon 9000 PCI (in a
celeron 500 pc)and glxgears only gives me 250fps on average, and openGL
applications only perform a little better than they did with the voodoo2
(in a p200
