Re: Missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen

Roland Scheidegger wrote: Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi! I'm trying to compile the unichrome_dri.so driver in the xc tree with latest Mesa cvs. When the driver is loaded I get a missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen. Something new I've left out? I've get that for r200 too. Seems to be related to the

Re: Missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen

Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi! I'm trying to compile the unichrome_dri.so driver in the xc tree with latest Mesa cvs. When the driver is loaded I get a missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen. Something new I've left out? I've get that for r200 too. Seems to be related to the t_vertex.c codegen additio

Re: [Dri-users] cvs compile trouble

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi!, I have a Debian SID runing on hp-compaq nx9010 laptop with ATI Radeon Mobility IGP345M After a lots of tries to compile dri+drm+mesa I got the errors attached in this mail. > In file included from r200_context.h:41, > from r200_sanity.c:41: > /usr/src/

Re: DRI driver broken when I enable gcc -O2 flag

On Mer, 2004-06-30 at 13:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am developing the DRI driver for s3 latest product DeltaChrome. > XFree86 version is 4.3.0,and gcc is the default in redhat9.0, > and the output of "gcc -v" is: > cc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) > > Furthermore,if I enable

Missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen

Hi! I'm trying to compile the unichrome_dri.so driver in the xc tree with latest Mesa cvs. When the driver is loaded I get a missing symbol _tnl_init_c_codegen. Something new I've left out? Best regards Thomas --- This SF.Net email sponsored b

Re: Free Test Suite for OpenGL?

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:40:27AM +0900, Sasayama wrote: | How complete is it in regard to the OpenGL specification? I've managed the development of a couple of OpenGL test suites (including the official conformance test suite for the first several years of its existence). A suite that aspires t

Re: Free Test Suite for OpenGL?

Keith Whitwell wrote: Sasayama wrote: Is there any free test suite for OpenGL? We'd like to test our DRI implementation, but don't need a trademark license at this time. glean.sf.net How complete is it in regard to the OpenGL specification? begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:=E7=AC=B9=E5=B1

Re: [Xorg] debrix

On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:14:00PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > This may be my lack of sleep, but the CONFIG_ usage seems to turn on > defines used only by userland, in the < XFree86 4.1.0 case. > > Now, if I was in charge I'd say "let's not kid ourselves that we really > support compiling XFree86