Re: Kernel oops when loading i830 module

2004-07-23 Thread Bill Gou
Dave Airlie wrote: > again please, found another error in the logic, this is like programming > by numbers!!! thanks be to God you found these issues before I submitted > this for the kernel :-) > > Still can't unload it. It seems the problem is that the kernel thought the driver is in use, and

[Bug 918] New: color buffer alpha channel not available in any visuals

2004-07-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Summary: color buffer alpha channel not available in any visuals Product:

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-23 Thread Sérgio Monteiro Basto
> Someone needs to go into x.org cvs, cd .../drivers/savage, cvs up > -jDRI-XFree86-4_3_99_12-merge -jDRI and resolve conflicts, place the new > code under a BuildDevelDRIDrivers ifdef, and test. Until then you won't > be able to build a working savage setup from x.org. > > #define BuildDevelD

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-23 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 01:56, Sérgio M. Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:04, Eric Anholt wrote: > > I still need to merge the development drivers > > (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do > > want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. > > yes , I

Re: Debian packages of DRI drivers

2004-07-23 Thread John Lightsey
On Thursday 22 July 2004 17:23, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > Since the packages from Micahel Dänzer are outdated and don't > contain the S3TC patch we now have the strange situation that the > lates non-free ATI drivers are easier to use on Debian GNU/Linux > than the lates DRI drivers. > Would it

Re: X.Org DRI merge

2004-07-23 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:32:55 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > also as far as I know the unichrome driver is in-secure it suffers I think > the same issues as the savage and mach64 with its DDX setting up in-secure > buffers... > > have a look at > http://dri.sourceforge.net

Re: X.Org DRI merge

2004-07-23 Thread Dave Airlie
also as far as I know the unichrome driver is in-secure it suffers I think the same issues as the savage and mach64 with its DDX setting up in-secure buffers... have a look at http://dri.sourceforge.net/IRC-logs/20040628.txt if this is so I recommend the via stuff goes in under devel for now ..

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-23 Thread M. Basto
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:04, Eric Anholt wrote: I still need to merge the development drivers (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. yes , I had this problem yesterday, DRI savage module doesn't compile.

[Bug 760] severe flickering with rendering on root window

2004-07-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Adam Jackson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 July 2004 00:04, Eric Anholt wrote: The point is that the DRI is merging into X.Org and there won't be a separate tree any more. I still need to merge the development drivers (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due

Re: Debian packages of DRI drivers

2004-07-23 Thread Jaakko Niemi
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > I think it would be useful if there were a script that downloads the > drivers, applies the S3TC patch if the user cooses to and creates Debian > packages optimized for the user's processor. It took about few minutes for me to checkout dri and