Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Dave Airlie
Still need someone with a Sparc machine to fix the ffb compile. I've got a cross compiler installed at home for just this purpose .. I'll work on it this evening.. Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux

[Bug 1220] Garbage screen after resume from suspend to disk

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1220] Garbage screen after resume from suspend to disk

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1220] Garbage screen after resume from suspend to disk

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 02:54 --- If you

[Bug 1220] Garbage screen after resume from suspend to disk

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:54:35AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: I've checked two new directories into DRM CVS for Linux 2.6 - linux-core, shared-core. This code implements a new model for DRM where DRM is split into a core piece and personality modules that share the core. The major reason for

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2004-09-29 at 13:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - once we have Alan's idea of the graphics core implemented drm_init() should go awaw Last I heard Dave Airlie had that working having fixed my bugs. --- This SF.net email is

Re: UT2003/4 nearly all textures are broken

2004-09-29 Thread Dieter Ntzel
Am Montag, 27. September 2004 19:30 schrieb Roland Scheidegger: Dieter Nützel wrote: So, it seems like we're seeing more ordering issues, now that things get emitted less often. Moving the eye emit to the end mostly fixed neverball's intro screen for me except for occasional flicker, and

[Bug 1461] missing textures in some games on r200

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 05:19 --- Roland,

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Dave Airlie
I have the basics working alright, my only issue was with getting proper sysfs with it, I'll dig up my latest version and post it, I've also got a ported DRM for it, at the moment it was doing something like /sys/devices/vga00 /sys/devices/vga01 one for each user of the card (multi-card would

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Christoph Hellwig wrote: - drm_flush is a noop. a NULL -flush does the same thing, just easier - dito or -poll - dito for -read Pretty sure you couldn't get away with null for these in 2.4, at least. Keith --- This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:29:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: - drm_flush is a noop. a NULL -flush does the same thing, just easier - dito or -poll - dito for -read Pretty sure you couldn't get away with null for these in 2.4, at least. Umm, of course

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Dave Airlie
- once we have Alan's idea of the graphics core implemented drm_init() should go awaw - drm_probe (and it's call to drm_fill_in_dev) looks a little fishy, what about doing the full -probe callback in each driver where it can do basic hw setup, dealing with pci and calls back into

[Bug 1461] missing textures in some games on r200

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 07:02 --- One more

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:12:03PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: Thinking about it, it may not have been a problem of crashing, but rather that the behaviour visible from a program attempting to read (or poll) was different with noop versions of these functions to NULL

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Keith Whitwell wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:29:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: - drm_flush is a noop. a NULL -flush does the same thing, just easier - dito or -poll - dito for -read Pretty sure you couldn't get away with null for these in

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:12:03PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: Thinking about it, it may not have been a problem of crashing, but rather that the behaviour visible from a program attempting to read (or poll) was different with noop versions of these functions to NULL versions, and that was

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Jon Smirl wrote: Drivers provide these callbacks.. struct drm_driver_fn { u32 driver_features; int dev_priv_size; int permanent_maps; drm_ioctl_desc_t *ioctls; int num_ioctls; int (*preinit)(struct drm_device *, unsigned long flags); void

[Bug 1220] Garbage screen after resume from suspend to disk

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1461] missing textures in some games on r200

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 07:47 --- I don't

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:25, Keith Whitwell wrote: The whole context thing in the kernel is pretty much cruft. The gamma module used to rely on it, maybe the ffb module if that still exists? It would be good to see this disappear. A few Gentoo Sparc folks use ffb, and in some cases it

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Keith Packard
Around 15 o'clock on Sep 29, Keith Whitwell wrote: A future X-on-GL world where regular applications are presumably doing direct rendering will change that assumption... I'm not planning on eliminating the X protocol in this environment, so unless cairo really takes off and applications

[Bug 1495] New: r200 Messed up display with UT2004 linux demo

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
(20040929). The display for the UT2004 linux demo (a 250+Mb download unfortunately :( ) is completely messed up -- there are planes of repeated textures sticking out all over the place. Btw, driconf doesn't want to talk to the driver either (?) (It says Driver r200 is not installed or does not support

[Bug 1495] r200 Messed up display with UT2004 linux demo

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 14:01 --- Your

[Bug 1495] r200 Messed up display with UT2004 linux demo

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 14:22 --- Ah: $

Re: compiling mach64 kernel module for 2.6.9-rc-mm4 kernel

2004-09-29 Thread David
El Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre del 2004 3:20 AM, Jon Smirl escribió: Get the code from here: cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm and build in the linux-2.6 directory. It looks like you are missing drm_sysfs.h which is is the CVS repository. I'm building mach64 from CVS on my

[Bug 1495] r200 Messed up display with UT2004 linux demo

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 14:52 --- xdriinfo

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:54:35 -0400 Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've checked two new directories into DRM CVS for Linux 2.6 - linux-core, shared-core. This code implements a new model for DRM where DRM is split into a core piece and personality modules that share the core. The major

[r200] root window capabilities - xscreensaver need stencil

2004-09-29 Thread Dieter Ntzel
/opt/Mesa /usr/X11R6/lib/xscreensaver/endgame -root -visual 0x24 endgame: ignoring `-visual 0x24' because of `-root'. endgame: using root window's visual 0x23. cpu vendor: AuthenticAMD cpu name: AMD Athlon(tm) MP MMX cpu detected. 3DNow! cpu detected. Testing OS support for SSE... yes. Testing OS

Re: compiling mach64 kernel module for 2.6.9-rc-mm4 kernel

2004-09-29 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:33:00 +0200 David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre del 2004 3:20 AM, Jon Smirl escribió: Get the code from here: cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm and build in the linux-2.6 directory. It looks like you are missing

Re: projtex on r200, texturing problem

2004-09-29 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2004 17:26 schrieb Andreas Stenglein: maybe this help a bit.. but I think its not a full fix. Not full for Celestia 'Earth - ISS' (few textures are still flickering, Eric?) and xscreensaver's 'pipe' angles are not full rendered. -Dieter Index:

Re: compiling mach64 kernel module for 2.6.9-rc-mm4 kernel

2004-09-29 Thread Jon Smirl
I made the linux vs linux-2.6 split because people wanted the GPL code isolated. Anyway, it looks like linux-core may override the linux-2.6 directory when we can say it is working. I thought the snapshots were snapshoting the whole DRM tree. I tried to fix it so that if you built the linux

[Bug 1461] missing textures in some games on r200

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 16:10 --- Created an

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Jon Smirl
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:52:38 +0200, Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it normal that the savage module looks unused? I can actually rmmod the savage module while X is running. After that direct rending fails with some error message about permissions ... reloading savage didn't help (of

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:25, Keith Whitwell wrote: Jon Smirl wrote: Drivers provide these callbacks.. struct drm_driver_fn { u32 driver_features; int dev_priv_size; int permanent_maps; drm_ioctl_desc_t *ioctls; int num_ioctls;

[Bug 1058] [PATCH] fix potential 64bit pointer problems

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1058 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 984] R200 rendering error in blocktube

2004-09-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

savage test notes/glDrawPixels problem

2004-09-29 Thread Steve Holland
I downloaded the latest savage and common snapshots today, and I have a few notes (thanks for the great work!): - The snapshots do not work out-of-the-box on 2.6 kernels -- the 2.6 DRM must be downloaded from CVS installed separately (this does not seem to be documented) - My previously