Just to update, I've looked at the fragment shader stuff and the
documentation I have isn't enough to implement the spec, we only have
access to the second stage registers (PP_CNTL - states second or only pass
registers)
I'm going to use the r300 stuff to start reverse engineering the fglrx
Dave Airlie schrieb:
Just to update, I've looked at the fragment shader stuff and the
documentation I have isn't enough to implement the spec, we only have
access to the second stage registers (PP_CNTL - states second or only pass
registers)
Is it enough to implement GL_ARB_texture_crossbar?
Am Samstag, den 08.01.2005, 20:54 -0500 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:18:24 + (UTC), Martin Lucina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Felix,
[... new Savage DRM ...]
I just tried this code via John's experimental Xorg packages at
www.nixnuts.net.
400fps in glxgears,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lightsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still wondering where /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/codeconv/ went though.
Is there a define to build these libraries that isn't in the sample
host.def for Xorg? Are they necessary for languages other than English?
Codeconv
Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Dave Airlie schrieb:
Just to update, I've looked at the fragment shader stuff and the
documentation I have isn't enough to implement the spec, we only have
access to the second stage registers (PP_CNTL - states second or only
pass
registers)
Is it enough to
Hello,
I wanted to test a bit the r300 drv on g5 but i get
a drmAddMap failed. I see a issue related to this
in the archive (september 2004). I assume it's have
been fixed.
My drm version is the one from r300 (linux-core)
but i guess there little difference between this trunk
and the official one.
Hi,
In the drm, I found that the memory allocator can handle both gart
(RADEON_MEM_REGION_GART) and fb (RADEON_MEM_REGION_FB) memory.
However, the second type is never used. Is there a reason for that ?
Stephane
---
The SF.Net email is
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to test a bit the r300 drv on g5 but i get
a drmAddMap failed. I see a issue related to this
in the archive (september 2004). I assume it's have
been fixed.
My drm version is the one from r300 (linux-core)
but i
drm driver, to keep it simple and prevent interference with X.
No my Xserver fail to initialize DRI, it fails with drmAddMap.
it says:
[drm] drmAddMap failed
And then tells there is no dri. I wanted to test r300 driver.
I have no more logs of that has i crashed my system.
Anyway, i first thought
I've seen so much activity on the r300_driver recently, I thought it'd
be good time to test it out on my 9800 and give as much feedback as
possible.
Unfortunately, I'm not even able to get it to compile. I think I've
followed the instructions correctly. I actually copied the
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first use in this
function)
^^
Know what I'm doing wrong?
There
Fix gcc 4 compilation in DRM.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.h
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/char/drm/drmP.h 2005-01-04 18:48:41.%N +0100
+++ linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.h
12 matches
Mail list logo
