Re: [PATCH] r300_scratch in r300_cmdbuf.c is broken

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:33:16 +0200 Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 01 March 2007 20:11, Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200 > > > > Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch

Re: [PATCH] Use constants during reset

On 2/26/07, Christoph Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a patch to use some more constants in r300ResetHwState() or > r300_state.c. > > Maybe some of the unk registers in r300_hw_state of r300_context.h > should be renamed, too. Pushed thx, btw in the future could you work with gi

Re: [PATCH] r300_scratch in r300_cmdbuf.c is broken

On Thursday 01 March 2007 20:11, Aapo Tahkola wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200 > > Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd > > packet is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should > > be like in t

Re: [PATCH] r300_scratch in r300_cmdbuf.c is broken

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200 Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd > packet is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should > be like in the attached patch. This patch will break 64 bit systems. It onl

[Bug 3493] r128: Entire X-windowing system hangs during normal 3D gaming

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3493 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #

Re: [PATCH] r300_scratch in r300_cmdbuf.c is broken

Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd packet is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should be like in the attached patch. On Wednesday 28 February 2007 22:33, Panagiotis Papadakos wrote: > Updated patch. Fix a check. > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 23:49