http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-02 22:20 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=11395)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=11395&action=view)
test case
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userp
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:08:57AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:50:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Graphics chips are complicated, but the bulk of the complexity is
> > not in modesetting. Do you really think that modesetting (and other
> > graphics hardw
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:31:10AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, August 23, 2007 6:44:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am *not* opposed to a scheme where userspace has to provide
> > information how to set up a desired mode. (Although I'm not conviced
> > it's really necessary
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11009
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
Configure bugmail: ht
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11434
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-02 04:02 PST ---
marking out -
if (info->IsMobility) {
if (xf86ReturnOptValBool(info->Options, OPTION_DYNAMIC_CLOCKS, FALSE)) {
RADEONSetDynamicClock(pScrn, 1);
} else {
