http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16246
--- Comment #2 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 22:55:47 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=16944)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16944)
xorg conf
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16246
--- Comment #1 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 22:55:23 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=16943)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16943)
xorg log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.c
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16245
--- Comment #1 from WuNian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 22:53:24 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=16942)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16942)
xorg log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16246
Summary: [i965 mesa_7_0_branch] glean case vertProg1 failed
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
P
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16245
Summary: [kernel modesetting] display mashed after change mode
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: major
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11877
--- Comment #16 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 22:41:24 PST ---
this issue also happen on mesa_7_0_branch now
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becau
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16243
--- Comment #2 from Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 21:23:03 PST
---
Nian, I wonder if this one is actually a batchbuffer problem... does it also
occur on just the batchbuffer branch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedeskt
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16243
--- Comment #1 from WuNian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 19:59:50 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=16940)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16940)
xorg log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16243
Summary: [kernel modesetting] X crashed when run rendercheck
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: major
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brian Paul
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Stephane wrote:
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> It seems like people are mostly concerned about gallium stability
>>> right now. How stable wioll the interfaces be in the future ? Maybe if
>>> you could tell us, t
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:39:35 +0200
Matthias Hopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sounds *very* interesting. I guess this was only a quick first
> discussion, so there probably isn't any hard evidence (read: code or
> text ;) to share...
Well the idea is that we better have old userspace which is
On Jun 05, 08 00:36:12 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Well i don't know anythings about r6xx but for radeon i was discussing
> with Dave a plan to add a new ioctl to submit packet in new cleaner way
> so that we can reuse current mesa driver with future memory manager enabled
> legacy free radeon dr
On Jun 04, 08 18:30:56 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Gallium might ultimately wind up in its own repository as a stand-alone
> project. Afterall, Gallium drivers could be used by APIs other than OpenGL.
Yes, but the base project is called Mesa and not OpenGL. So that
wouldn't exactly stop that ;-)
On Jun 05, 08 00:39:26 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > I was envisioning a completely separate r600 DRI driver for r6xx+,
> > > since, if I understand correctly, the r6xx 3D engine is a completely new
> > > chip with nothing in common with the older Radeons. On the other hand,
> > > though, I hav
14 matches
Mail list logo
