On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Here's a patch that implements what we've been talking about:
- uses the atomic counter while interrupts are on, which means the
get_vblank_counter callback is only used when going from off-on to
account for missed events
-
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13358
--- Comment #26 from Guillaume Melquiond [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17
00:42:39 PST ---
The following is a wild guess, since I haven't had time to compile and test a
modified 1.4 server. It's only from a quick glance at the server code. As I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16860)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16860action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output before suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16861)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16861action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output after suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13358
--- Comment #27 from Roland Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17
05:09:59 PST ---
Isn't this a dupe of #13863?
Length of the glx reply is simply larger than what the server fills in (though
those zeros aren't really what should be in
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10088
--- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 07:18:55 PST
---
No change with 7.1~rc3-1.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10088
--- Comment #6 from Ben Gamari [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 07:56:15 PST ---
What hardware/driver are you on?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13358
--- Comment #28 from Guillaume Melquiond [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17
08:01:18 PST ---
You are right, this is the same as bug #13863. It's really unfortunate the
patch from the bug-report wasn't applied. Anyway, the patch below is the patch
On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:51 pm Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Here's a patch that implements what we've been talking about:
- uses the atomic counter while interrupts are on, which means the
get_vblank_counter callback is only used
