http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17054
Summary: mesa/drm: compilation broken for i915 module with 2.6.26
kernel
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-10 10:48 ---
Jesse,
I am sorry, I cannot reproduce it. I tried with x11, xv, gl, gl2 and all worked
ok. I do not know what can have happened, but I am sure that it happened three
times in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Michel Dänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My plan is to included a device specific 32 bit bitfield per buffer in
the reply to DRI2Getbuffers, which is what the client calls to ask the
On 8/2/08, Jerome Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be totaly wrong so feel free to ignore these. I got the feeling
that the user test base on linux kernel is far bigger than ours. Also
i think that our test user base are people wanting lastest things with
old kernel, while i
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 19:11 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My plan is to included a device specific 32 bit bitfield per buffer in
the reply
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16157
haihao [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
