On Friday, January 08, 2010 2:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:18:01 -0700
H Hartley Sweeten hartl...@visionengravers.com wrote:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: Remove unnecessary casts.
The struct seq_file 'private' member is a void *, the casts are not
needed.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: Remove unnecessary casts.
The struct seq_file 'private' member is a void *, the casts are not needed.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten hswee...@visionengravers.com
Cc: David Airlie airl...@linux.ie
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
Stanse found a potential null dereference in i915_suspend.
There is a check for dev and dev_priv being NULL, but dev is
dereferenced earlier. Move the dereference after the check.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby jsl...@suse.cz
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 18 +-
1 files
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_info.c: Remove unnecessary casts.
The struct seq_file 'private' member is a void *, the casts are not needed.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten hswee...@visionengravers.com
Cc: David Airlie airl...@linux.ie
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_info.c
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:32:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c: Remove unnecessary casts.
The struct seq_file 'private' member is a void *, the casts are not needed.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten hswee...@visionengravers.com
Cc: David Airlie airl...@linux.ie
---
diff --git
Am Freitag 08 Januar 2010 23:29:11 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Hendrik Sattler
p...@hendrik-sattler.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a ATI HD2400XT in my notebook and tried the radeon.ko module with
modeset=1 (X cannot use this, yet).
While this gives me a framebuffer
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:33:40PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Adding dri-devel@ to CC.
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100
r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
With some progress in PowerManagement support (there's a patch
nearly done for reading the P-tables, written mostly by xexaxo,
In function ttm_bo_move_ttm, ttm_bo_move_memcpy, and
ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup, just before function exits, there is:
ttm_flag_masked(save_flags, new_mem-placement,
TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE);
Is it needed because save_flags is just a local variable?
Thanks
Austin
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 23:36 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Freitag 08 Januar 2010 23:29:11 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Hendrik Sattler
p...@hendrik-sattler.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a ATI HD2400XT in my notebook and tried the radeon.ko module with
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:20:00PM +0800, Yuan, Shengquan wrote:
In function ttm_bo_move_ttm, ttm_bo_move_memcpy, and
ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup, just before function exits, there is:
ttm_flag_masked(save_flags, new_mem-placement,
TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE);
Is it needed because
2010/1/10 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14747
Subject : bisected 2.6.32 regression: synaptics touchpad doesn't work
Submitter : François Valenduc francois.valen...@tvcablenet.be
Date : 2009-12-06 11:16 (36
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25733
Christophe Saout christo...@saout.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25733
--- Comment #4 from Nikolay Rysev mad.f...@gmail.com 2010-01-11 06:12:33 PST
---
I can also confirm this bug.
2.6.33-rc3, x86_64, dri2proto + mesa + libdrm + xf86-video-ati from git, RV630.
I don't have 32-bit userspace.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15030
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14535
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.com
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25875
--- Comment #1 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2010-01-11 06:39:33 PST ---
Can you try mesa from git master or the 7.7 branch? Dave fixed some issues
there:
Zitat von Xavier Bestel xavier.bes...@free.fr:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 23:36 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Freitag 08 Januar 2010 23:29:11 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Hendrik Sattler
p...@hendrik-sattler.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a ATI HD2400XT in my
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25982
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32563|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23993
--- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2010-01-11 06:51:48 PST ---
Does mesa from git master or the 7.7 branch work any better? This commit might
help:
From 16de3600adde106fbb6eb828a3fa1b935d938425 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:50:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: fix up LVDS handling on macs
Based on radeonfb code and recent ddx fix.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25982
Lauri Kasanen cur...@operamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32564|application/octet-stream|text/plain
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25982
--- Comment #3 from Lauri Kasanen cur...@operamail.com 2010-01-11 08:26:13
PST ---
Forgot to mention the newer Mesa also brought an update to libdrm (2.4.11 with
7.4.4, 2.4.17 with 7.6.1).
Apologies if this is a libdrm bug instead. How can I
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in Intel KMS, which we haven't gotten close to
yet. I'm not even sure the Intel guys are taking stable seriously
enough yet. So far I
I want to dig much more into this asynchronous memory manager mechanism.
Now I have several questions:
1.According to Thamos's suggestion, each memory manager will has a fence
object with it, which is delivered from driver's *move* function, my
question is what's relationship between the memory
On 10-01-10 12:15, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:43:02 +0200
Alexey Dobriyanadobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100
r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
1. joi pointed out that procfs is deprecated, and I should use
sysfs instead.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23993
--- Comment #9 from Rafał Mużyło galtge...@o2.pl 2010-01-11 09:19:59 PST ---
By now, I'm on 7.7 and this single patch
doesn't seem to help.
Now it's
xorg-server 1.7.4
kernel 2.6.32
libdrm-2.4.17
--
Configure bugmail:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:03:02AM +0800, Donnie Fang wrote:
I want to dig much more into this asynchronous memory manager mechanism.
Now I have several questions:
1.According to Thamos's suggestion, each memory manager will has a fence
object with it, which is delivered from driver's *move*
From 6d980869ef031752dac505c1aacbbe221fb2c6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:39:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/rv100: reject modes 135 Mhz on DVI
Due to heat issues. Fixes fdo bug 25992
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From 6d980869ef031752dac505c1aacbbe221fb2c6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:39:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/rv100: reject modes 135 Mhz on DVI
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:03:02AM +0800, Donnie Fang wrote:
I want to dig much more into this asynchronous memory manager mechanism.
Now I have several questions:
1.According to Thamos's suggestion, each memory manager will has a fence
object with it, which is
On Monday 11 January 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/1/10 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14747
Subject : bisected 2.6.32 regression: synaptics touchpad doesn't
work
Submitter : François Valenduc
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From 6d980869ef031752dac505c1aacbbe221fb2c6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in Intel KMS, which we haven't gotten close to
yet. I'm
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From 6d980869ef031752dac505c1aacbbe221fb2c6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Monday 11 January 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:32:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:12:37 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes
jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
On Monday 11 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in
On Monday 11 January 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 23:27 Sun 10 Jan , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.32, for which
there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed
already,
please let me know.
If
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:38:46 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14997
Seems to be a 2.6.31 - 2.6.32 regression. I don't know if the
assignment to DRI was appropriate?
On Monday 11 January 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:38:46 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14997
Seems to be a 2.6.31 - 2.6.32 regression. I don't know if the
assignment to DRI was appropriate?
I'm not sure
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
On 23:27 Sun 10 Jan , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.32, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed
already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.32,
On 10-01-10 12:15, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:43:02 +0200
Alexey Dobriyanadobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100
r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
1. joi pointed out that procfs is deprecated, and I should use
sysfs instead.
/proc is not
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force all
users to the experimental paths. So yes, I would say
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
The HP comaq nx9020/Samsung SX20S laptop always report that the LID status is
closed and we can't use it reliabily for LVDS detection. So add the two boxes
into the quirk list.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25982
--- Comment #4 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2010-01-11 15:48:27 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Forgot to mention the newer Mesa also brought an update to libdrm (2.4.11 with
7.4.4, 2.4.17 with 7.6.1).
Apologies if this is a
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25997
Summary: libdrm builds programs only used during `make check` in
`make all`
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15002
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
From a1119b4663f0e986468dbbb086432f058384fc79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:47:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/r6xx+: make irq handler less verbose
Unhandled vectors can be safely ignored, no need
to spam the kernel log by
52 matches
Mail list logo
