https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14442
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29632
Fabio fabio@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabio@libero.it
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29632
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||airl...@linux.ie
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14442
Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29632
Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29632
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29632
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #15 from Elmar Stellnberger estel...@gmail.com 2011-02-23
20:27:24 ---
Unfortunately the tests of Comment #14 were not significant. I have tested the
patches with the same kernel but a different Xorg namely
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #16 from Elmar Stellnberger estel...@gmail.com 2011-02-23
20:45:45 ---
As Comment #15 shows there is currently something more fundamentally messed up
with KMS (which is apparently not EDID-related). Actually the situation has
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #17 from Elmar Stellnberger estel...@gmail.com 2011-02-23
21:29:44 ---
Concerning your patches I believe that they will be valuable for many users
(although I could not verify them for me yet.). As I have found out flawed
EDIDs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
--- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2011-02-24 04:36:28
---
The old behavior was wrong. The temperature value in the register was
interpreted incorrectly prior to my recent patch (improper handling of signed
values).
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org 2011-02-24
05:14:11 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The old behavior was wrong.
Don't care really. We shouldn't change interfaces.
The temperature value in the register was
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2011-02-24 06:19:12
---
The previous behavior was undefined; it just happened to be 0 for one user.
It's reading back a register from an MMIO aperture on a disabled PCI device.
It
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2011-02-24 06:21:01
---
None of the temperatures potentially returned are accurate when the device is
disabled.
--
Configure bugmail:
Hi all:
TTM provide ttm_bo_type_user which create bo from user space memory.
I try to use this functions, but find some problems:
1. Can not get pages when driver try to bind user pages to GPU apterure.
ttm-state set to tt_unbound when add ttm structs, while
ttm_tt_populate prevent driver
16 matches
Mail list logo
