On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Rahul Karnik wrote:
> When 4.1.0 was released, the downloadable binary
> package was discontinued. Now I understand the
> rationale behind this, but would it be possible to
> keep a 4.1.0 level snapshot available for download?
> The reason I ask is that as of now, downloading
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, mythos wrote:
> If I don't press Ctrl^C and open a new console and type quake3
> to begin a new game my kernel gives an Ooops :
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0014
> printing eip:
> d29f1693
> *pde =
> Oops:
> CPU:
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 06:11:19PM -0400, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> > > This is interesting since terra and I both have crashes within 30 seconds
> > > on these boards. I'm very interested in what you've done to get it
> > > working. She has a KT7-RA
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:53:12PM +0100, Iain Thomas wrote:
> > Well, it does sometimes work- I have a Radeon 64M/ViVo/183Mhz working
> > OKish on a KT133 (KT7-RAID)...
> > But then, other people have chronic problems with the sa
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:44:57AM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > I'm planning to change my old SuperMicro P6DBU (BX chipset) with a
> > newer Abit VP6 that includes VIA VT82C694X and VT82C686B chipsets, I would
> > like to know what is the cu
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:12:47PM +0100, Iain Thomas wrote:
> > > As I said, it seems specific to the Radeon 64, the 32s have been reported
> > > to work fine.
> > We all know that the various Radeons have differend core clock
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:47:23PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > > There also appears to be a conflict with the Radeon 64 and the KT133A (or
> > > at least the Abit KT7A..)
> > I've got a KT133A and a Radeon All-in-Wonder, with no problems at all.
>
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> Just got CVS tree and got lost ...
> Linux Kernel source tree is much more clear for me.
>
> Can you tell me where to look radeon_dri.so sources ?
> or at least some FAQ or links to explain this xc tree "mess" :) for me.
./xc/lib/GL/dri/drm/radeon_
