Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: Move radeon_get_clock_info() call out of

2009-09-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thierry Vignaud tvign...@mandriva.com writes: For me, drm-next's still broken even with that patch whereas stock 2.6.31 is working fine (modulo hard freeze after a couple hours) on RV350 AP [Radeon 9600]. It works fine on RV530 though: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [drm] radeon kernel

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: Move radeon_get_clock_info() call out of

2009-09-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie writes: An rv350 specific issue then? I booted it on my desktop rv370 and I'm sure Michel has booted it on his rv350 macbook, so might be a bios issue or soemthing else. Maybe but note that drm-next just complains that there's no modes: Connected connector with

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: Move radeon_get_clock_info() call out of

2009-09-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@googlemail.com writes: Yesterday, I reported on #radeon IRC that latest drm-next was broken for me on a Mobility Radeon X1300 (RV515, [1002:714a]) radeon-gfx card. Booting with modeset=1 into run-level 3, ended up with a black screen and frozen system (immediately

[BUG] radeon kernel command checker blocks 32 bit gl(x)info on x86_64

2009-09-15 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Hi, It looks like the radeon kernel command checker blocks some of gl(x)info's 32 bit commands. Here's dmesg output ioctl32(glxinfo:5153): Unknown cmd fd(4) cmd(80046402){t:'d';sz:4} arg(ff9b517c) on /dev/dri/card0 ioctl32(glinfo:5184): Unknown cmd fd(4) cmd(80046402){t:'d';sz:4} arg(ff86c5dc)

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Save and restore AtomBIOS scratch regs during S/R

2009-08-15 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com writes: We need to save/restore the scratch regs on atom and pre-atom cards. Other than that, looks good. We should also probably re-probe on resume in case the user has changed monitors during suspend. I hadn't reported this yet, but on resuming a KMS

[PATCH] fix not including r300 compiler in tarballs

2009-08-14 Thread Thierry Vignaud
The following patch fixes missing r300 compiler in generated tarballs: diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile index 95c6765..3bce7d2 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@

Re: [PATCH] fix not including r300 compiler in tarballs

2009-08-14 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thierry Vignaud tvign...@mandriva.com writes: The following patch fixes missing r300 compiler in generated tarballs: diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile index 95c6765..3bce7d2 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile +++ b/src/mesa

Re: [PATCH] fix not including r300 compiler in tarballs

2009-08-14 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thierry Vignaud tvign...@mandriva.com writes: Thierry Vignaud tvign...@mandriva.com writes: The following patch fixes missing r300 compiler in generated tarballs: diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/Makefile index 95c6765..3bce7d2 100644