http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 02:47 ---
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is old regression. Tested with glxgears i get this results:
v2.6.19 _1413.112_FPS_
v2.6.20
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is old regression. Tested with glxgears i get this results:
v2.6.19 _1413.112_FPS_
v2.6.20 1280.060 FPS
v2.6.22 1300.116 FPS
v2.6.24 1205.895 FPS
v2.6.25-git* 1226.967 FPS
[...]
I assume that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 16:19 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 17:26 ---
On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
Summary: [old regression] performance