The bug fix in question is this one:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=42beefc00
I did some final testing today.
The problem with the black screen I was having with 2.6.30 seems to have been
solved in rc7, X works flawlessly there.
2.6.29.4 and
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sat, 16 May 2009 22:05:58 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #8 from Jos van der Ende ser...@xs4all.nl 2009-05-11 15:18:56 ---
I did bisecting, the bad commit is:
commit cdecff6864a1cd352a41d44a65e7451b8ef5cee2
Author: venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com
Date: Fri
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mi...@elte.hu,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #7 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-04-28 21:49:19 ---
On Monday 27 April 2009, Jos van der Ende wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:43:44 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2009, Jos van der Ende wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:43:44 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
I've tested with kernel 2.6.29.1. The problem still persists. While
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:43:44 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
I've tested with kernel 2.6.29.1. The problem still persists. While
everything works fine with 2.6.28 or lower, starting X (both 1.3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #5 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-04-26 11:27:03 ---
Notify-Also : DRI dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
--- Comment #6 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-04-26 17:44:39 ---
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #2 from Jos van der Ende ser...@xs4all.nl 2009-04-17 06:13:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=21023)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21023)
strace of startx with a working kernel (2.6.27-gentoo-r10)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #3 from Jos van der Ende ser...@xs4all.nl 2009-04-17 06:14:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=21024)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21024)
strace of startx with a broken kernel (02.6.29)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
--- Comment #4 from Jos van der Ende ser...@xs4all.nl 2009-04-17 06:17:49 ---
Sorry it took me a while to get back to this. The machine in question is in a
building where I don't have free access to.
I poked around a bit and found the system
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
Alex Villacis Lasso avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
Andrew Morton a...@osdl.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@osdl.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12947
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@sisk.pl
22 matches
Mail list logo
