http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #41 from Lluís virik...@gmail.com 2009-04-11 11:21:56 PST ---
More than a year passed... does anybody know anything new? I tried mesa 7.4,
xorg server 1.5.3, libdrm 2.4.7, linux 2.6.28.9, openchrome 0.2.903. And I see
the same
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-03 12:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #38)
You appear to know your way around source code; you may wish to join #unichrome
on Freenode.net.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-03 20:30 PST ---
Is there anyone who successfully installed the driver the freezing problem is
there or it just works?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 02:00 PST ---
Via released a new driver.
Anyone tried it?
Which one? AFAIK, Via drivers have nothing to do with DRI - please correct me
if I'm wrong.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #28 from
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 09:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
VIA provides only binaries for DRI modules these days, so they should not be
considered in the context of this bugreport. We are not even able
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 09:49 PST ---
It doesn't look like Valentine Sinitsyn and Luc Verhaegen
Just to make it clear: I'm only the original bug reporter, not
Unichrome-DRI/Unichrome/OpenChrome developer.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 10:05 PST ---
Just to make it clear: I'm only the original bug reporter, not
Unichrome-DRI/Unichrome/OpenChrome developer.
Right, you're not. It wasn't meant to be offensive. Also
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 10:27 PST ---
Right, you're not. It wasn't meant to be offensive. Also not to Luc.
Heh. Confusing me with driver developer looked like a compliment, not the
offense. ;-)
It's a huge
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 11:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #31)
it's good news more people are interested in this release.
Lets hope it's worth it.
Nothing is worth it when it doesn't come with source. As
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 11:41 PST ---
Nothing is worth it when it doesn't come with source.
Good god it DOES!
Futher more I did not choose to comment my findings (thats all I've
been up too) on THIS list
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 13:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
[quote]stinke on Ubuntu lauchpad[/quote
Okay, so someone has reported the new release in the
DRI Mailing List [1] and it's been commented.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 14:20 PST ---
What release would that be and why do i not see anything in the mesa tree?
That was a reference to this thread which the person who copied my text
didn't include.
Have
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 22:49 PST ---
No and I don't have those files.
Confirm. I don't have those files in my archive (md5:
eed5daf69f0b970aec0a654fdfcb731e) either. Blobs there are standard parts of
Mesa
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-07 10:42 PST ---
Appreciate that piece of wisdom. :-) Will certainly try as you advise. Will
keep posting on progress as and when time permits. Thanks again.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 14:04 PST ---
It's a little more complicated than that. The Unichromes have an AGP command
queue which feeds a Virtual Queue in vram. If the lockup occurs during a
texture read, it's
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 06:40 PST ---
Have an update for this. Please check
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8641
(Sometimes the link is not resolved properly. So here it is again without the
full
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 07:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Have an update for this. Please check
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8641
(Sometimes the link is not resolved properly. So here it
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 07:28 PST ---
Sound sane to me.
But the question is: why do we observe random lookups (i.e. one game runs fine
second game locks up) if IRQ acknowledge code is incorrect?
--
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 07:42 PST ---
Good question. ;-) I have no answers to that one.
But notice that the bug is not at all random. The bug is fully reproducible
each and everytime it happens, and in
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 11:52 PST ---
Hi.
The IRQ issue on K8M800 has been around for ages. I'm not saying it can't be
fixed (sometimes when my K8M800 has been running for quite some time it will
work
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 21:57 PST ---
Appreciate your comments. You may have saved us a long time in going off in
some wrong direction. ;-) As of now, turning IRQ off in the X Driver causes
more frequent
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-26 23:16 PST ---
Update: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8641
I have submitted a patch to this bug that deals with the IRQ interrupt bug. It
seems to work, but sadly, this
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-27 00:53 PST ---
I agree. The spurious interrupt issue was specifically for the K8M800 device,
that is device id, 3108. So if you do not have this device, then you probably
wouldn't see
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-26 12:15 PST ---
Update: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8641
I have submitted a patch to this bug that deals with the IRQ interrupt bug. It
seems to work, but sadly, this
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 04:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The situation appears to be more complicated than I thought initially. I've
did
additional debugging and now think that all games are suffering
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 05:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
First of all, thank you for the information: very nice job! I suspected it's
something to deal with VBLANK IRQ - and now we know this for sure.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 06:36 PST ---
It just occured to me that this could be in some way related to [Bug
8641] New: interrupts not properly handled for VIA K8M00 / UniChrome Pro.
It probably has something
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 06:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
It probably has something to do with it, but what's the bug number and/or
Bugzilla where it was reported? Looking for #8641 in this Bugzilla
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 06:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
It probably has something to do with it, but what's the bug number and/or
Bugzilla where it was reported?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 06:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
First of all, thank you for the information: very nice job! I suspected it's
something to deal with VBLANK IRQ - and
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-05 17:50 ---
This
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-28 21:28 ---
I
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-07 00:51 ---
The
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-07 00:58 ---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-18 20:57 ---
40 matches
Mail list logo
