On Mer, 2004-01-21 at 00:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Fix system.h to always define cmpxchg.h and check its presence at
> > runtime when the DRM module loads, then you can build 386 kernels that
> > support DRI on higher machines.
> >
> > The problem isnt that cmpxchg definitely doesn't exist, so sy
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:04:59AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-01-20 at 21:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I got the following compile error in 2.6.1-mm5 with X86_CMPXCHG=n.
> > This problem is not specific to -mm, and it always occurs when you
> > include support for the 386 cpu (oposed to t
On Maw, 2004-01-20 at 21:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I got the following compile error in 2.6.1-mm5 with X86_CMPXCHG=n.
> This problem is not specific to -mm, and it always occurs when you
> include support for the 386 cpu (oposed to the 486 or later cpus) since
> in this case X86_CMPXCHG=n and ther
I got the following compile error in 2.6.1-mm5 with X86_CMPXCHG=n.
This problem is not specific to -mm, and it always occurs when you
include support for the 386 cpu (oposed to the 486 or later cpus) since
in this case X86_CMPXCHG=n and therefoore cmpxchg isn't defined in
include/asm-i386/system
