Re: [Dri-devel] Adding extensions to the indirect path?

2003-02-25 Thread Ian Romanick
Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: An issue was recently found with some extensions that are part of the OpenGL core that are not exported by the indirect path. By exported I mean that they are not listed by GL_EXTENSIONS. This caused at least on hic-up when trying to test UT2k3 with

[Dri-devel] Adding extensions to the indirect path?

2003-02-19 Thread Ian Romanick
An issue was recently found with some extensions that are part of the OpenGL core that are not exported by the indirect path. By exported I mean that they are not listed by GL_EXTENSIONS. This caused at least on hic-up when trying to test UT2k3 with 'LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=y'. I realize that

Re: [Dri-devel] Adding extensions to the indirect path?

2003-02-19 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: An issue was recently found with some extensions that are part of the OpenGL core that are not exported by the indirect path. By exported I mean that they are not listed by GL_EXTENSIONS. This caused at least on hic-up when trying to test UT2k3 with

Re: [Dri-devel] Adding extensions to the indirect path?

2003-02-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: An issue was recently found with some extensions that are part of the OpenGL core that are not exported by the indirect path. By exported I mean that they are not listed by GL_EXTENSIONS. This caused at least on hic-up when trying to test UT2k3 with

Re: [Dri-devel] Adding extensions to the indirect path?

2003-02-19 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: An issue was recently found with some extensions that are part of the OpenGL core that are not exported by the indirect path. By exported I mean that they are not listed by GL_EXTENSIONS. This caused at least on hic-up when trying