On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 01:51:10PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> Just wanted to let you know that after adding the newline to the
> Imakefile.inc, the build seems to have completed without a hitch.
Thanks Adam. For a while I wasn't sure if the newline had any effect or
not.
> I assu
Jose,
Just wanted to let you know that after adding the newline to the
Imakefile.inc, the build seems to have completed without a hitch. I
assume this has made it's way into CVS?
Adam
On Sat, 31 May 2003, [iso-8859-15] José Fonseca wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:23:47PM -0500, Jo
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:43:42PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:23:47PM -0500, John Sheu wrote:
> > How are those packages coming? What was the "build problem" with them?
>
> Sorry, I didn't do it right away and eventually forgot about it. I've
> checked the logs and t
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:23:47PM -0500, John Sheu wrote:
> How are those packages coming? What was the "build problem" with them?
Sorry, I didn't do it right away and eventually forgot about it. I've
checked the logs and the problems seems to be the same problem reported
by Adam Kirchoff. Her
On Fri, 30 May 2003, [iso-8859-15] José Fonseca wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:49:57AM -0500, John Sheu wrote:
> > Two questions...
> >
> > 1. Are the wrapped binary driver packages ever coming back?
>
> Appearently there is a problem while building them, because they are
> back for some t
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:49:57AM -0500, John Sheu wrote:
> Two questions...
>
> 1.Are the wrapped binary driver packages ever coming back?
Appearently there is a problem while building them, because they are
back for some time. I'm going to look into it.
> 2.It seems with an old one I
Two questions...
1. Are the wrapped binary driver packages ever coming back?
2. It seems with an old one I got (binary driver packages) it was missing the
libGL's so that once installed, (for example) glxinfo segfaults as it tries
to load old libGL's. An oversight or purposeful omissi
