Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:23:16PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm happy to report that I found a solution to the merge problems Eric > > and I were seeing. I believe the problem had to do with vendor branches. > >

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Ian Romanick
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:32, Keith Whitwell wrote: Hmm. These problems only arise because of the way the merge was done? Why not just document the right way to do the merge? I think tagging the branch point is a good idea regardless. I agree. Documenting both the right way

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:32, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Hmm. These problems only arise because of the way the merge was done? Why > not just document the right way to do the merge? I think tagging the branch point is a good idea regardless. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), X

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Dave Airlie
> > Hmm. These problems only arise because of the way the merge was done? Why > > not just document the right way to do the merge? > I'd agree with Keith the proper way to merge needs documenting, CVS vendor import is what is needed, the XFree CVS is vendor imported into our DRI tree, the chang

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:32:45 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > José Fonseca wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > >>Hi all, > >> > >>I'm happy to report that I found a solution to the merge problems Eric > >>and I were seeing. I believe th

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: Hi all, I'm happy to report that I found a solution to the merge problems Eric and I were seeing. I believe the problem had to do with vendor branches. They are created automatically when sources are imported using

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm happy to report that I found a solution to the merge problems Eric > and I were seeing. I believe the problem had to do with vendor branches. > They are created automatically when sources are imported using cvs > impo

[Dri-devel] CVS merge problem solved + suggestion for cvs policy

2003-10-07 Thread Felix Kühling
Hi all, I'm happy to report that I found a solution to the merge problems Eric and I were seeing. I believe the problem had to do with vendor branches. They are created automatically when sources are imported using cvs import. Many files from XFree86 had a vendor branch (e.g. revisions 1.1.1.x) wi